[ اللغة الانجليزية ] : last year......old plan group

[لولو السكري]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة احسن شئ

being a teacher dominated his habit of analysis his way
المقطع الثاني عنenactment
moral evaluation المقطع الثالث

حاولت ماشفت شي له علاقه به لكن ادا حطيتي يمكن جمل اكثر بادور في النت لانه كل الي ملتنا اياه اني اخده من النت

[ليان محمد]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة لولو السكري

الصراحه من وجهة نظري ومن مذاكرتي شفت انه الملزمه مرة مهمه وفيها حوايج واجد لكن التفريغ احسه بس هدره

طيب ايش اسم الملزمه ؟ ومتى نزلتها ؟

[لولو السكري]

الجزء السادس والسابع تتكلم عمن ليفنز وريتشارد

[ليان محمد]

ممكن تقولين لنا ايش المواضيع المهمه الي فيها علشان اقراهم من النت ؟

[لولو السكري]

ترى الاخطاء الي اكتبها لاني اكتب في جوالي وجوالي يخليني اكتب بدون ما اشوف وش اكتب

[لولو السكري]

introduction and books
the four kinds of meaning
aim of his book
close reading(words kinds of language context and meaning with context rhyme,meter and metaphors
meter and rhyme
value of metaphors
the kind of language
1emotive language
2refreantial language
How Richards is different from Eliot and Leavis

[لولو السكري]

اتمنى اكون افدتش وادا افدتش لاتنسين تدعي لي

[ليان محمد]

مشكورة يعطيك العافيه وبالتوفيق يارب

[رنومه..]

مرحبا بنات..
هذي جزئية ليفز اللي مو موجوده بالتفريغ و نقلتنا اياها..
الله يعطيها العافيه وحده جمعتهم بس مالقت اول بارقراف،
ياليت اللي عندها تكتبه..

Enactment is the first word one must take count *of an estimate of his views. It is the notion that works of art act their moral judgment. It is brought out in an attempt to assess the limitations of Jonson Augustans' mind and sensibility was confronted with Shakespeare's characteristics use of language. Works of art enact their moral evaluation. They do so generally not by deploying words to reinforce a didactic intention but by a specifically poetic use of language which Leavis characterizes as the poetic creator.
*
Leavis is insisting on a conception of literature which has relevance and value for other things beside literature. a vitalizing recourse of concrete concern living as well as reading for writing. Leavis goes on to talk not about intentions and the correct way of bringing them into art but bout language and about the kind of inner life which it must maintain a contact if it is to be at all capable of registering the source of valuation which literature exists to register. This concern of life is a concern for a moral poetic vitality which can have varying manifestation.
*
The word enactment implies that good poetry embodies enacts a valuation of a reality at once inner and outer. To enact a valuation is to realize whatever is evaluated. It is to bring us into an immediate living relation to reality. *

[شتاء عمري]

هذا الشي موجود بتفريغ العام ليفز ومنه فيه كلام رنومه

though Leavis ' view and literary criticism is based on the destruction of what he called the organic community by the advent of the machine and mass culture. Based on tradition, cut work and close personal relationship, the organic community is harmonious whereas industrial society based on rules , machines and unanimity is dissonant. Leavis' comments on culture belong to tradition dating back to at least the late 18th century whose thinkers were alarmed by the growing separation of the economy and the society. His argument was that a growth of the press underlines a common culture by creating different markets for different tastes. The constant reinforcement of these tastes variable made it difficult for any one group to find a common ground with any other group. Consequently, there is no agreement about what constituted standards. In this situation, the artist had a little choice but to write for a particular market rather than an educated public.
Enactment is the first word one must take count of an estimate of his views. It is the notion that works of art act their moral judgment. It is brought out in an attempt to assess the limitations of Jonson Augustans' mind and sensibility was confronted with Shakespeare's characteristics use of language. Works of art enact their moral evaluation. They do so generally not by deploying words to reinforce a didactic intention but by a specifically poetic use of language which Leavis characterizes as the poetic creator.
Leavis is insisting on a conception of literature which has relevance and value for other things beside literature. a vitalizing recourse of concrete concern living as well as reading for writing. Leavis goes on to talk not about intentions and the correct way of bringing them into art but bout language and about the kind of inner life which it must maintain a contact if it is to be at all capable of registering the source of valuation which literature exists to register. This concern of life is a concern for a moral poetic vitality which can have varying manifestation.



دعووواتكم